SEDs (vnc_00) wrote in ed_ucate,

A Case Against Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS)

This will be a short entry, really just a follow up on the findings mentioned in the last entry. In particular: the issue of EDNOS, transitions between eating disorders and how the DSM should be changed to reflect the clinical reality of eating disorders (and what is the clinical reality?). I do not want to repeat myself here, so for an introduction to these issues, please see my last entry.

In this study, Eddy et al followed 246 women who were initially diagnosed with either AN or BN, for an average of 9 years. The main goal was to study the growing disparity between (1) the consensus that eating disorders are not stable overtime and how (2) the current diagnostic criteria which do not adequately address this, by following the clinical presentation of EDs overtime and providing suggestions for the upcoming DSM-V.


ArticleEddy, K.T., Swanson, S.A., Crosby, R.D., Franko, D.L., Engel, S., & Herzog, D.B. (2010). How should DSM-V classify eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) presentations in women with lifetime anorexia or bulimia nervosa? Psychological Medicine, 40 (10), 1735-1744 PMID: 20047706 

Please comment on the website :)

x-posted to my Journal.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

  • 1 comment